|
Proposals for Title Registration 1. Hong Kong is one of the few common law jurisdictions that still operates a deeds registration system for recording interests in land and property, rather than a system of registration of title. The Land Registration Ordinance, under which the registration of deeds is conducted was enacted in 1844 and is the oldest piece of Hong Kong legislation still in daily use. In recent years it has been supported by computerization of the registers and imaging of instruments in order to make searches easier. However, the fact that the registers remain simply an index to instruments has significant effects on the efficiency with which conveyancing and other dealings in property can be conducted. Every time a transaction takes place a solicitor has to review the deeds in order to check the title, unlike under a system of registered title where the register itself gives the evidence of current ownership and interests in the property. 2. In 1988 the then Registrar General established a working party to examine the introduction of registered title for Hong Kong drawing on schemes in place in comparable jurisdictions. The objective was to improve the efficiency and security with which property could be dealt with so as to better serve the public and professionals engaged in property related business. By 1993 a bill had been prepared. This proposed the automatic conversion of all property for which registers of deeds existed into property with registered title. The Bill was introduced into the Legislature in 1994 but lapsed at the end of the session. The major objection was to the method of conversion - known as 'midnight conversion' - on the grounds that it gave insufficient notice and insufficient protection against the loss of equitable interests that can be claimed against property under present practice. 3. A revised bill was gazetted in December 2002. This proposed replacing the 'midnight' conversion mechanism with 'gradual conversion' under which there would be compulsory applications for conversion upon first sale of a property after enactment, along with opportunity for voluntary applications for conversion without a sale. During deliberation in the Legislative Council it was made clear that the Law Society did not feel able to support the approach on account of the liabilities that it appeared to place on solicitors during the conversion. There was also strong demand for a more certain timetable for conversion rather than indefinite parallel operation of deeds and title registers. 4. In response to these concerns a new mechanism, termed 'daylight conversion' was developed. Under this mechanism -
|